rclv83 wrote:joint legal. When I objected to the therapist, NEW therapist basically said "Dont' care what you say. NJ has the right to seek care for the child, so I'll see d7 whether you like it or not.".
rclv83 wrote:I'm tempted to just take d7 for periodic visits with the old therapist and just let NJ do whatever she's going to do. This game never ends unless I stop playing.
rclv83 wrote:guys, thank you. HOWEVER, I think this will play out that I will have to get the order, not her.
I'm tempted to do as you suggest: draft a letter to therapist stating my objections to treatment, cc NJ, and then get out of the way. If the therapist ever popped up later as ammo in something, I could say "Never met with her. And I objected to her way back when."
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Jesus Christ and 3 guests