Fatheroffour wrote:Apparently you don't know what the word arbitrary means either.
dadforever wrote:...have Dads be the gender that gets full custody and have Moms have 0 parenting rights
minuette wrote:dadforever wrote:...have Dads be the gender that gets full custody and have Moms have 0 parenting rights
Do you understand that you have described the outcome of divorces involving minor children under English Common Law (from which the legal systems of 49 states and DC are primarily derived), from the 13th-early 20th centuries? That through the mid-19th century, children could be treated as chattels? That it took until the push to implement the Populist platform of the 1890s before regulation of child labor became an issue of national prominence? That women had no legal right to vote nationwide until 1920?
The legal system is imperfect. Granted. But let us not be so hurried to nail ourselves to the cross on Good Friday, that we forget the US legal system has evolved and continues to evolve, and that we are living in an era of legal gender parity in the family courts that was unheard of for most of the last 700 years of recorded law.
Chaos wrote:Not to mention the fact that none of this works the way you think it does. Your beliefs on this subject range from outright wrong, to extreme exaggerations of what actually happens.
Fatheroffour wrote:We are living in an era of unprecedented oppression and INequality.
Your ignorance of history is astounding.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests